NHS Reinstatement Bill – please sign this open email to Andrew Fisher, Executive Director of Labour Party policy

This is an open email to Andrew Fisher in support of Professor Allyson Pollock’s email to him about the Labour Party position on the NHS Reinstatement Bill, following the Labour Party Leader’s (or someone’s) decision to veto MP Eleanor Smith’s presentation of it to the House of Commons on 11th July as a 10 Minute Rule Bill.
If you agree with this email, please add your name this evening (June 26th) in the comments box below the open email  (below) and we will add your name to the email when we send it at midnight tonight.

Professor Allyson Pollock’s main concerns in her email to Andrew Fisher are:
“I am pleased that you remain entirely comfortable with the thrust of the Bill, as I would expect after last year’s Conference motion.
At the same time though I’m perplexed and deeply worried by what seems to be an intention to proceed in a timorous, piecemeal fashion. Structures follow on from the duties and powers, and I cannot see how ending private sector contracts and bits of the 2012 Act could work, rather than reinstating the duty to provide a National Health Service and the structures that would flow from that, given the extensive powers that FTs and NHSE now have. I am puzzled as to why you do not commit to reinstating the duty to provide, with geographic responsibilities and services integrated into geographic bodies, which are the hallmarks of the NHS and universal services – and the driving thrust of the Bill. Perish the thought that your first Bill would be little more than ‘the Efford Bill plus’.
We are well aware that the Bill will not, and cannot, be ‘copied and pasted’ onto the statute book. There is plenty of time to consult – we have been doing it ourselves for over four years already –  and I can see no excuse for putting it off until after an initial limited Bill that would not go to the heart of what is required for restoring a universal and comprehensive service. The sensible approach would be to consult now on the NHS Reinstatement Bill in order to get the structures right. Sorry, but ‘constraints of government’ and of ‘legislative programmes’ smack as evasive.  
I agree that getting public health and social care right is crucial – but the Bill is not prescriptive on public health, apart from the principle that it should be part of the NHS as it was before the Lansley Act; and its permitted (not mandated) integration of social care would be dependent on necessary future social care legislation. Again, I don’t understand why the Bill’s proposed provisions appear to cause difficulty on these points and why they cannot be consulted on now.
I’d also like to know more about what you are referring to in relation to ‘the placement of statutory duties on regional mayors’ – the Bill was intended to ensure that they were involved, not somehow to impose onerous duties on them.”
Sorry for short notice, but we will be sending the email at midnight Tuesday 26th June,  in time for the Wednesday 27th June Labour Party meeting about the NHS Reinstatement Bill.
Email to Andrew Fisher starts here:

Dear Andrew Fisher

Calderdale and Kirklees 999 Call for the NHS is a cross-party/no party group that has campaigned enthusiastically for the cross-party NHS Reinstatement Bill since 2014.

It is central to our core aims of stopping and reversing NHS privatisation.

We are deeply disappointed that the NHS Bill will not have a reading on 11 July under the 10 Minute Rule Bill, as Eleanor Smith MP was due to present it.  We are worried about government legislation bringing in the US-style organisational structure of Integrated Care.

We’re aware that you, as the Labour Party Executive Director of Policy, have been in touch with Professor Pollock. We also understand that a meeting is scheduled on Wednesday 27th June, for discussion of the NHS Bill among the Labour front bench and health team, to which Professor Pollock is invited and which Eleanor Smith MP hopes to be invited to as well.

We share Professor Pollock’s concerns that she expressed in her email to you, and we urge the meeting to take them on board and address them.

We also fully support Eleanor Smith in her attempt to present the NHS Bill as a Ten Minute Rule Bill and urge you to make sure she is invited to the meeting and listened to.

Our anxieties about your email to Professor Pollock centre on the possibility outlined by Professor Pollock, that a “Labour” NHS Reinstatement Bill would indeed be timorous and piecemeal in its approach to ending NHS privatisation. We fear a re-run of 2015 when the Labour Party’s alternative to the NHS Reinstatament Bill was the rather pathetic Efford Bill.

We agree with Professor Pollock that any NHS Bill that limited itself to ending private sector contracts and bits of the 2012 Act, rather than reinstating the duty to provide a National Health Service and the structures that would flow from that, would not solve the problems of privatisation and fragmentation in the NHS.

We are particularly worried that Labour-led Councils in Calderdale, Kirklees, the whole of West Yorkshire and beyond are busily setting up so-called place-based and locality Accountable Care Systems (which, as we all know, NHS England has re-branded Integrated Care Systems in order to avoid the connotations of the USA’s health care services.)

Labour elected mayors, for instance in South Yorkshire, Greater Manchester and London, also seem to be fully signed up to Accountable/Integrated Care.

Fundamentally the Labour party is split on the issue.

Many Labour party members who joined to support Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership bid, and have remained to do their best to make him the next prime minister (and this includes a fair proportion of members of Calderdale and Kirklees 999 Call for the NHS) remain adamant in their opposition to the imposition of Accountable Care on the NHS – with good reason.

They – and other members of Calderdale and Kirklees 999 Call for the NHS – fail to understand why Labour Party elected representatives across the country are actively working to introduce Accountable Care (however NHS England likes to spin and rebrand it), despite the Composite 8 motion at the last Labour Party Conference.

In this context, there also appears to be Labour Party support for the Health and Social Care Select Committee’s proposals for primary or secondary legislation to enable the creation of Accountable/Integrated Care Organisations – by whatever name they might go by. There also seems to be significant Labour Party support for the quite detailed proposals in the Darzi/IPPR Review of Health and Care, about what these new ACOs would do over the 10 years from 2020.

This gives an extra edge to our shock that Jeremy Corbyn or someone on the Labour shadow front bench – we really don’t care who – told Eleanor Smith MP not to present the NHS Bill as a Ten Minute Rule Bill on 11 July. And it shapes our worry that a Labour Party NHS Bill would in fact be an Accountable/Integrated Care Organisation enabling Bill.

In the circumstances, we fully share Professor Pollock’s concerns and support her email to you.

Yours,

Jenny Shepherd (Chair, Calderdale and Kirklees 999 Call for the NHS)

Christine Hyde, (CK999 and N Kirklees Support the NHS)

Katherine Horner, (CK999)

Andrea English (CK999)

Chrissie Parker (CK999)

100 comments

  1. Everyone I know has used the nhs at some point in their lives, some would not be here without it. The idea of that vital lifeline not being easily available for my children is terrifying and enough to stand up for

    Like

  2. I support this bill and cannot understand why the Labour Party have not bearing in mind their manifesto pledge. I will have to rethink my support if the reinstatement bill is not pursued

    Like

  3. The NHS is unique in that it does not discriminate on race, gender or faith.
    It will treat you whether you are young, old, rich or poor. It sets no boundaries as to who you vote for in an election, nor if a Brexiteer or remainer.

    It will however do nothing written above if we all sit back and say nothing to stop it becoming a commercial enterprise. Even under the Thatcher government, any thoughts of privatisation were dismissed.

    Yet we have a government who is prepared to risk all by selling, under a screen of smoke and mirrors, to theprivate sector which will soon learn discovering that running a health service is a poisoned chalice commercially. The profiteers will wash their hands of it at the first scent of failure and the NHS will be gone.

    NHS stands for National Health Service- it also stands for something else where the PM is concerned…..

    Not Hers to Sell!!

    Like

  4. A Publicly owned and publicly provided NHS for all will be more efficient economically and also be more likely to have healthcare as its sole aim rather than profit of corporations-the rest ideas the world isn’t pushing for universal healthcare-don’t let the UK regress

    Like

  5. Much work has gone into the Reinstatement Bill. I do hope Labour aren’t indulging in some sort of white – or should that be red – wash. They’ve mucked about with the reinstatement bill before and came up with the pathetic Efford bill. This is too important for political posturing,

    Like

  6. I fully support this email. If Labour consider the NHS worth saving then it is their moral imperative to support THIS bill. Any tweaks can be done at a later date.

    Like

  7. I absolutely support the move to re-nationalise the NHS and call on the Labour Party which founded it to return to its true principles

    Like

  8. I fully support Professor Allyson Pollock & those who are behind the NHS Reinstatement Bill. Taking back our Health Service is more important to us than the wealth being made by private business.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.